Casio TRYX vs Nikon S220
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio TRYX vs Nikon S220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Nikon S220 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Casio TRYX versus Nikon S220, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the S220 (10MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TRYX was manufactured 24 months after the S220 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TRYX grades vs the S220 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio TRYX vs Nikon S220 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX & Nikon Coolpix S220. The entire galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery & Nikon S220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Nikon S220
| TRYX | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Casio TRYX
| S220 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Nikon S220
| TRYX | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio TRYX vs Nikon S220 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX has got external dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Nikon S220 has dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX versus Nikon S220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TRYX and the S220.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and S220 is 99 and 97 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Nikon S220 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The picture underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TRYX and S220.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio TRYX to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent TRYX provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Nikon S220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio TRYX vs Nikon S220 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Nikon Coolpix S220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Nikon Coolpix S220 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-03 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 2000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 100 grams (0.22 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | EN-EL10 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $689 | $56 |
