Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TRYX was manufactured 5 years earlier than the TG-860 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a short view of how the TRYX scores vs the TG-860 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Olympus TG-860
| TRYX | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Casio TRYX
| TG-860 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 49 months |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Olympus TG-860
| TRYX | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the TRYX against the TG-860.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and TG-860 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TRYX and TG-860.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-860 to give you more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TRYX is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio TRYX vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $689 | $279 |