Casio TRYX vs Pentax XG-1
99 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
66 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio TRYX vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio TRYX and Pentax XG-1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and XG-1 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TRYX was brought out 4 years earlier than the XG-1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the TRYX scores vs the XG-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio TRYX vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX & Pentax XG-1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Pentax XG-1
| TRYX | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Casio TRYX
| XG-1 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Pentax XG-1
| TRYX | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio TRYX provides outside dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Pentax XG-1 has specifications of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX and Pentax XG-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TRYX vs the XG-1.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and XG-1 is 99 and 66 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The graphic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and XG-1.
All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Pentax XG-1 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older TRYX will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio TRYX vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Pentax XG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Pentax XG-1 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-07-15 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 567g (1.25 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LB-060 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $689 | $599 |