Casio TRYX vs Samsung PL200
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Casio TRYX vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio TRYX vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio TRYX versus Samsung PL200, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TRYX was launched 6 months after the PL200 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TRYX grades against the PL200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio TRYX vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX & Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung PL200
| TRYX | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio TRYX
| PL200 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung PL200
| TRYX | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | July 2010 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX features outer dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Casio TRYX versus Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TRYX vs the PL200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TRYX and PL200 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TRYX and PL200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung PL200 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio TRYX vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung PL200 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $689 | $0 |