Casio TRYX vs Samsung SL202
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio TRYX vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Photography Glossary Casio TRYX vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Casio TRYX versus Samsung SL202, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TRYX was introduced 23 months later than the SL202 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TRYX scores against the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio TRYX vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung SL202
| TRYX | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 23 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio TRYX
| SL202 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung SL202
| TRYX | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio TRYX versus Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the TRYX compared to the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and SL202 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and SL202.
Plainly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio TRYX to produce extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger TRYX will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio TRYX vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $689 | $140 |