Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST100
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Casio TRYX versus Samsung ST100, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TRYX was manufactured 13 months later than the ST100 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TRYX scores vs the ST100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX & Samsung ST100. The entire galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung ST100
| TRYX | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Casio TRYX
| ST100 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung ST100
| TRYX | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX has got exterior dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung ST100 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX versus Samsung ST100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TRYX against the ST100.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and ST100 is 99 and 95 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TRYX and ST100.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung ST100 to produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent TRYX should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung ST100 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $689 | $250 |