Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST65
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Casio TRYX and Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TRYX was released around the same time to the ST65 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TRYX matches up versus the ST65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX & Samsung ST65. The complete galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung ST65
| TRYX | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio TRYX
| ST65 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung ST65
| TRYX | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX has exterior measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX and Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the TRYX compared to the ST65.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and ST65 is 99 and 99 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TRYX and ST65.
Clearly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST65 to show extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $689 | $130 |