Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TRYX was launched 13 months later than the TL240 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the TRYX grades against the TL240 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung TL240
| TRYX | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio TRYX
| TL240 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung TL240
| TRYX | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TRYX against the TL240.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and TL240 is 99 and 95 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and TL240.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung TL240 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher TRYX will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung TL240 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST5000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 160g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $689 | $171 |