Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL500
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Released July 2010
- Also referred to as EX1
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL500 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Casio TRYX and Samsung TL500, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the TRYX (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TRYX was introduced 6 months after the TL500 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the TRYX scores vs the TL500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX and Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung TL500
TRYX | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio TRYX
TL500 | TRYX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 461k | Sharper screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung TL500
TRYX | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | July 2010 | Similar generation | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX enjoys outer dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX and Samsung TL500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TRYX versus the TL500.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and TL500 is 99 and 88 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The image below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and TL500.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TRYX with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Casio TRYX will give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio TRYX vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung TL500 |
Otherwise known as | - | EX1 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $689 | $527 |