Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB2200F
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio TRYX and Samsung WB2200F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TRYX was introduced 4 years prior to the WB2200F which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TRYX scores versus the WB2200F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX and Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung WB2200F
| TRYX | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio TRYX
| WB2200F | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 36 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung WB2200F
| TRYX | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio TRYX offers outside dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Casio TRYX and Samsung WB2200F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the TRYX against the WB2200F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and WB2200F is 99 and 59 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and WB2200F.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB2200F to offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged TRYX is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung WB2200F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 708 grams (1.56 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $689 | $599 |