Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31


86 Imaging
43 Features
28 Overall
37
Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2009
- Replacement is Sigma DP2s

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Casio TRYX and Sigma DP2, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the TRYX (1/2.3") and DP2 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.

The TRYX was released 16 months later than the DP2 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TRYX matches up vs the DP2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX & Sigma DP2. The complete galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Sigma DP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Sigma DP2
TRYX | DP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | September 2009 | More recent by 16 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Casio TRYX
DP2 | TRYX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Sigma DP2
TRYX | DP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio TRYX provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
See the Casio TRYX and Sigma DP2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the TRYX against the DP2.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and DP2 is 99 and 86 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and DP2.
All in all, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TRYX featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio TRYX will result in more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent TRYX is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
Casio Exilim TRYX | Sigma DP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Sigma DP2 |
Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-09-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2640 x 1760 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 41mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 15 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 280g (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $689 | $649 |