Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Sigma DP2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
43
Features
28
Overall
37

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Released January 2011
Sigma DP2
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 320 x 240 video
  • 41mm (F) lens
  • 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
  • Revealed September 2009
  • Replacement is Sigma DP2s
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Overview

Below is a thorough assessment of the Casio TRYX and Sigma DP2, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the TRYX (1/2.3") and DP2 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TRYX was released 16 months later than the DP2 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TRYX matches up vs the DP2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Sigma DP2

 TRYX DP2 
RevealedJanuary 2011September 2009More recent by 16 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution461k230kSharper screen (+231k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Casio TRYX

 DP2 TRYX 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Sigma DP2

 TRYX DP2 
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio TRYX provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).

See the Casio TRYX and Sigma DP2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the TRYX against the DP2.

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and DP2 is 99 and 86 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and DP2.

All in all, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TRYX featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio TRYX will result in more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent TRYX is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX Portrait photography details
Sigma DP2 Portrait photography details
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
55
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (5MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio TRYX
Street photography with Sigma DP2
58
screen can move to multiple angles
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
67
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (280g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio TRYX Sports photography information
Sigma DP2 Sports photography information
17
fixed focal length (21mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
29
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (41mm)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (5MP)
no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX Travel photography advice
Sigma DP2 Travel photography advice
56
display is selfie friendly
lack of Timelapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
67
lighter than competitors in class (280 grams)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f)
low MP (5MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio TRYX Landscape photography advice
Sigma DP2 Landscape photography advice
28
screen is a good size (3")
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (21mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
48
focusing manually
very good max aperture (f)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (41mm)
small screen (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
low MP (5 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX Vlogging information
Sigma DP2 Vlogging information
62
display is selfie friendly
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
lack of microphone port
28
very good max aperture (f)
lighter than competitors in class (280 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (320 x 240 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio TRYX vs Sigma DP2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Sigma DP2
 Casio Exilim TRYXSigma DP2
General Information
Brand Name Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim TRYX Sigma DP2
Type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2011-01-05 2009-09-21
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 5 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 2640 x 1760
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21mm (1x) 41mm (1x)
Max aperture f/2.8 -
Macro focusing range 8cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.7
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of screen 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/8 seconds 15 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.30 m
Flash options no built-in flash Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 320x240
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 280g (0.62 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/MMC card
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $689 $649