Casio TRYX vs Sony WX220
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
96 Imaging
42 Features
41 Overall
41
Casio TRYX vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Launched February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs Sony WX220 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio TRYX and Sony WX220, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and WX220 (18MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TRYX was announced 4 years earlier than the WX220 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TRYX scores vs the WX220 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio TRYX vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The whole galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery and Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Sony WX220
| TRYX | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Casio TRYX
| WX220 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Sony WX220
| TRYX | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio TRYX offers external measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony WX220 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Casio TRYX and Sony WX220 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TRYX versus the WX220.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and WX220 is 99 and 96 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and WX220.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Sony WX220 to render greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older TRYX will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio TRYX vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 121g (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $689 | $198 |