Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
75 Imaging
43 Features
20 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f6c3/3f6c3b4a68f79fa84757307d20331d97546ac9ac" alt="Epson R-D1 front Epson R-D1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9207c/9207c00abb1a3f512690da028260fac624b4f599" alt="Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front"
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 620g - 142 x 89 x 40mm
- Introduced March 2004
- Replacement is Epson R-D1x
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Epson R-D1 and Fujifilm F200EXR, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Epson and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the R-D1 (6MP) and Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the R-D1 (APS-C) and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The R-D1 was released 6 years before the Fujifilm F200EXR and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Epson R-D1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the R-D1 matches up against the Fujifilm F200EXR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Epson R-D1 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The complete galleries are provided at Epson R-D1 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Epson R-D1 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
R-D1 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 235k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+5k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Epson R-D1
Fujifilm F200EXR | R-D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2009 | ![]() | March 2004 | More recent by 62 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2" | Larger display (+1") |
Common features in the Epson R-D1 and Fujifilm F200EXR
R-D1 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Epson R-D1 enjoys exterior measurements of 142mm x 89mm x 40mm (5.6" x 3.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 620 grams (1.37 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Epson R-D1 and Fujifilm F200EXR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the R-D1 against the Fujifilm F200EXR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d01d2/d01d2840989f9330ed84b84d4c652f1be69c7924" alt="Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR size comparison Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the R-D1 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 75 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d426a/d426adc4c2d66d12a3e638b647e819d8db990967" alt="Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR top view buttons comparison Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR top view buttons comparison"
Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by checking specs. The visual below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the R-D1 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The R-D1 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F200EXR will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older R-D1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff92/7ff92b916ff1235501ee72efe5883f8a0ce19935" alt="Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR sensor size comparison Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR sensor size comparison"
Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86ff5/86ff5837475b42fa58b04a148ea175836a7e2212" alt="Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Epson R-D1 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Epson R-D1 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Epson | FujiFilm |
Model type | Epson R-D1 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2004-03-11 | 2009-04-30 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.6mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 369.7mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3008 x 2000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 235k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 620 grams (1.37 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 89 x 40mm (5.6" x 3.5" x 1.6") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-50 |
Self timer | No | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD card | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $1,709 | $350 |