Epson R-D1x vs Olympus E-PM2
75 Imaging
46 Features
19 Overall
35


89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Epson R-D1x vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 620g - 142 x 89 x 40mm
- Released February 2009
- Replaced the Epson R-D1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1

Epson R-D1x vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Epson R-D1x and Olympus E-PM2, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Epson and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the R-D1x (6MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the R-D1x (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor measurements.

The R-D1x was introduced 5 years prior to the E-PM2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the R-D1x matches up against the E-PM2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Epson R-D1x vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Epson R-D1x & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The whole galleries are available at Epson R-D1x Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Epson R-D1x over the Olympus E-PM2
R-D1x | E-PM2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Epson R-D1x
E-PM2 | R-D1x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 51 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 235k | Clearer display (+225k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Epson R-D1x and Olympus E-PM2
R-D1x | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Epson R-D1x vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Epson R-D1x comes with exterior measurements of 142mm x 89mm x 40mm (5.6" x 3.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 620 grams (1.37 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Epson R-D1x and Olympus E-PM2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the R-D1x against the E-PM2.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R-D1x and E-PM2 is 75 and 89 respectively.

Epson R-D1x vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the R-D1x and E-PM2.
Plainly, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The R-D1x with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will deliver greater detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older R-D1x is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Epson R-D1x vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Epson R-D1x vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Epson R-D1x | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Epson | Olympus |
Model type | Epson R-D1x | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-02-27 | 2013-05-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3008 x 2000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 235k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 620g (1.37 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 89 x 40mm (5.6" x 3.5" x 1.6") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | No | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,709 | $448 |