FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the C135 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe AV200 was announced 12 months prior to the C135 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the AV200 matches up versus the C135 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 & Kodak EasyShare C135. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Kodak C135
| AV200 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the FujiFilm AV200
| C135 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Kodak C135
| AV200 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm AV200 provides outside dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Kodak C135 has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the AV200 against the C135.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and C135 is 94 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV200 and C135.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of images but you will want to take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged AV200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | 175g (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $0 |