FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the AV200 (14MP) and Z915 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe AV200 was announced 2 years after the Z915 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the AV200 matches up vs the Z915 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Kodak Z915
| AV200 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the FujiFilm AV200
| Z915 | AV200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Kodak Z915
| AV200 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm AV200 offers physical dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the AV200 versus the Z915.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and Z915 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV200 and Z915.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the FujiFilm AV200 to offer greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent AV200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Also called as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $0 | $200 |