FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z950
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix AV205
Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the FujiFilm AV200 versus Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe AV200 was launched 7 months after the Z950 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the AV200 grades versus the Z950 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Kodak Z950
| AV200 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the FujiFilm AV200
| Z950 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Kodak Z950
| AV200 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm AV200 has physical measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm AV200 versus Kodak Z950 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the AV200 against the Z950.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and Z950 is 94 and 89 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and Z950.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the FujiFilm AV200 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer AV200 provides an edge in sensor tech.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography features
Kodak Z950 Portrait photography features
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
you can focus manually
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Street photography advice
Kodak Z950 Street photography advice
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than average in class (243 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Sports photography info
Kodak Z950 Sports photography info
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (180 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Travel photography details
Kodak Z950 Travel photography details
good megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
not so great battery power (180 shots)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
built-in flash
great reach (350mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (243 grams)
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Landscape photography camera
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
not so great battery power (180 shots)
missing Timelapse function
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with FujiFilm AV200
Vlogging with Kodak Z950
wide angle not good (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone socket
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (243 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm AV200 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) | 243 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $250 |