FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon S9900
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon S9700
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the FujiFilm AV200 and Nikon S9900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe AV200 was unveiled 5 years prior to the S9900 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the AV200 grades versus the S9900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Nikon S9900
| AV200 | S9900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the FujiFilm AV200
| S9900 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Nikon S9900
| AV200 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm AV200 comes with external measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm AV200 and Nikon S9900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the AV200 and the S9900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and S9900 is 94 and 88 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the AV200 and S9900.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S9900 to give greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older AV200 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 289 grams (0.64 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 300 images |
| Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $300 |
