FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2017
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Nikon. The image resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the W300 (16MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe AV200 was brought out 7 years earlier than the W300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the AV200 matches up versus the W300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Nikon Coolpix W300. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Nikon W300
| AV200 | W300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the FujiFilm AV200
| W300 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 77 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Nikon W300
| AV200 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV200 enjoys outside measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Nikon W300 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the AV200 vs the W300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the AV200 and W300 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The visual here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and W300.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Nikon W300 to offer more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older AV200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm AV200 vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Alternative name | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2017-05-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 231 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 280 shots |
| Battery type | AA | Built-in |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $387 |