FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus SH-3
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix AV205
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus SH-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe AV200 was revealed 6 years earlier than the SH-3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the AV200 scores against the SH-3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus SH-3
| AV200 | SH-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the FujiFilm AV200
| SH-3 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 62 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus SH-3
| AV200 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm AV200 has physical dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the AV200 versus the SH-3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and SH-3 is 94 and 88 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the AV200 and SH-3.
All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older AV200 will be behind in sensor tech.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography factors
Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography factors
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Street photography factors
Olympus SH-3 Street photography factors
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
includes focus by touch
lighter than competition (271 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm AV200
Sports photography with Olympus SH-3
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery pack (180 per charge)
no phase detect AF
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
good battery life (380 CIPA)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Travel photography highlights
Olympus SH-3 Travel photography highlights
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low battery pack (180 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
good battery life (380 per charge)
lighter than competition (271g)
includes focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Landscape photography camera
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low battery pack (180 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (380 CIPA)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Vlogging features
Olympus SH-3 Vlogging features
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic port
reasonably wide (25mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
good video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lighter than competition (271 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 380 images |
| Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $579 |