FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix AV205
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe AV200 was introduced 12 months before the TG-320 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the AV200 matches up vs the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus TG-320
| AV200 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the FujiFilm AV200
| TG-320 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus TG-320
| AV200 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 offers outside dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the AV200 compared to the TG-320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and TG-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the AV200 and TG-320.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you should always consider the age of the cameras into account. The older AV200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography highlights
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
good megapixels (14MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Street photography details
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition in class (155g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (180 shots)
has no phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography highlights
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery (180 CIPA)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (32mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
lighter than competition in class (155g)
environment proofing
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
low battery (150 per charge)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (32mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery (180 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low battery (150 shots)
no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
wide angle not great (32mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic port
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | 150 pictures |
| Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $0 |
