FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix AV205
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is pretty close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe AV200 was introduced 5 years before the TG-4 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the AV200 grades against the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus TG-4
| AV200 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the FujiFilm AV200
| TG-4 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 51 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus TG-4
| AV200 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 provides external dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the AV200 and the TG-4.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and TG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The image here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV200 and TG-4.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-4 to result in greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged AV200 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography features
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
provides face detect focus
saves RAW formats
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Street photography advice
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (247g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Sports photography camera
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (180 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
better than average battery (380 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography advice
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (180 CIPA)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
better than average battery (380 shots)
environment proofing
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition (247g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm AV200
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-4
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery pack (180 per charge)
lack of Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
better than average battery (380 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging highlights
wide angle not the best (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than competition (247 grams)
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Alternate name | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 380 images |
| Battery style | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $379 |