FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix AV205
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe AV200 was released 12 months before the VG-160 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the AV200 scores vs the VG-160 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus VG-160
| AV200 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the FujiFilm AV200
| VG-160 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus VG-160
| AV200 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 has got outer measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the AV200 against the VG-160.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and VG-160 is 94 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specifications. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and VG-160.
Plainly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you should really take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged AV200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography factors
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
decent megapixels (14MP)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Street photography information
Olympus VG-160 Street photography information
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VG-160 Sports photography highlights
good megapixels (14MP)
features tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (180 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (165 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography highlights
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery power (180 per charge)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
lighter than competition in class (125g)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery (165 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography factors
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery power (180 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
really wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
bad battery (165 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Vlogging camera
wide angle not the best (32mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
really wide (26mm)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (125g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 165 photographs |
| Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $90 |