FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix AV205
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Photography Glossary FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe AV200 was introduced at a similar time to the VR-330 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the AV200 matches up versus the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus VR-330
| AV200 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the FujiFilm AV200
| VR-330 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus VR-330
| AV200 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | February 2011 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 provides physical dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the AV200 and the VR-330.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and VR-330 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The pic underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the AV200 and VR-330.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of pictures but you might want to take the release date of the products into consideration.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography features
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography features
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
good MP (14MP)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm AV200
Sports photography with Olympus VR-330
decent MP (14MP)
has tracking focus
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery (180 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
bad battery (180 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
good MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery (180 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse mode
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging advice
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $220 |