FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh CX4
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
Portability
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix AV205
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Below, we are looking at the FujiFilm AV200 and Ricoh CX4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the AV200 (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe AV200 was brought out 5 months later than the CX4 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the AV200 scores vs the CX4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Ricoh CX4
| AV200 | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the FujiFilm AV200
| CX4 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Ricoh CX4
| AV200 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | August 2010 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm AV200 features physical measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm AV200 and Ricoh CX4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the AV200 against the CX4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and CX4 is 94 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The graphic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the AV200 and CX4.
All in all, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the FujiFilm AV200 to deliver extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography factors
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
you can focus manually
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm AV200
Street photography with Ricoh CX4
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205g)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Sports photography features
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography features
MP count good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (180 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Travel photography camera
MP count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery power (180 shots)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
lighter than others in class (205g)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 Landscape photography features
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography features
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery power (180 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV200 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Vlogging camera
wide angle not good (32mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone socket
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $211 |
