FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
![FujiFilm FinePix AV200 front FujiFilm FinePix AV200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200/FujiFilm-AV200-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-80 front Ricoh WG-80 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-80/Ricoh-WG-80-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The AV200 was revealed 12 years prior to the WG-80 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the AV200 matches up against the WG-80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Ricoh WG-80
AV200 | WG-80 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the FujiFilm AV200
WG-80 | AV200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2022 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 138 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Ricoh WG-80
AV200 | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.70" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 offers external measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the AV200 versus the WG-80.
![FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the AV200 and WG-80 is 94 and 91 respectively.
![FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and WG-80.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to produce greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older AV200 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Ricoh WG-80 |
Also called as | FinePix AV205 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2022-05-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.70 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 images | 300 images |
Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $0 | $300 |