FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung HZ35W
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Photography Glossary FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the FujiFilm AV200 versus Samsung HZ35W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe AV200 was unveiled 7 months later than the HZ35W which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the AV200 matches up vs the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Samsung HZ35W
| AV200 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the FujiFilm AV200
| HZ35W | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung HZ35W
| AV200 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV200 has got outside dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm AV200 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the AV200 and the HZ35W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the AV200 and HZ35W is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV200 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the FujiFilm AV200 to provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher AV200 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Alternate name | FinePix AV205 | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Battery type | AA | - |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $300 |