FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung ST65
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the FujiFilm AV200 versus Samsung ST65, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe AV200 was manufactured within a month of the ST65 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm AV200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the AV200 grades versus the ST65 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Samsung ST65
| AV200 | ST65 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the FujiFilm AV200
| ST65 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung ST65
| AV200 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV200 comes with outside dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the FujiFilm AV200 versus Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the AV200 compared to the ST65.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and ST65 is 94 and 99 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the AV200 and ST65.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of photos however you really should factor the production date of the cameras into account.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung ST65 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $130 |