FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL350
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternative Name is WB2000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the AV200 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe AV200 was brought out 11 months later than the TL350 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the AV200 scores versus the TL350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 & Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Samsung TL350
| AV200 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the FujiFilm AV200
| TL350 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung TL350
| AV200 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV200 offers external measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung TL350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the AV200 compared to the TL350.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and TL350 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by checking technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the AV200 and TL350.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the FujiFilm AV200 to give extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern AV200 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also called | FinePix AV205 | WB2000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 195 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Battery type | AA | - |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $400 |