FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL500
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternative Name is EX1
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the FujiFilm AV200 versus Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the AV200 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the AV200 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe AV200 was launched 6 months after the TL500 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the AV200 grades against the TL500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 & Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Samsung TL500
| AV200 | TL500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the FujiFilm AV200
| TL500 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Samsung TL500
| AV200 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | July 2010 | Similar age | |
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV200 has got external measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm AV200 versus Samsung TL500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the AV200 and the TL500.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the AV200 and TL500 is 94 and 88 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and TL500.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The AV200 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the FujiFilm AV200 will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm AV200 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Samsung TL500 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AV205 | EX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-07-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 386 gr (0.85 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $527 |