FujiFilm AV200 vs Sony T900
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
FujiFilm AV200 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the FujiFilm AV200 and Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe AV200 was unveiled 23 months after the T900 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm AV200 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the AV200 grades versus the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm AV200 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Sony T900
| AV200 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the FujiFilm AV200
| T900 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Sony T900
| AV200 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm AV200 offers outside measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm AV200 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the AV200 and the T900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and T900 is 94 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The pic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and T900.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the FujiFilm AV200 to resolve extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent AV200 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
FujiFilm AV200 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Also called as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $300 |