Clicky

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
20
Overall
30
FujiFilm FinePix AV250 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

FujiFilm AV250
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 32-96mm (F) lens
  • 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2011
  • Also Known as FinePix AV255
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the AV250 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The AV250 was released 21 months later than the 9000 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the AV250 matches up vs the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Olympus 9000

 AV250 9000 
LaunchedJanuary 2011May 2009More recent by 21 months

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the FujiFilm AV250

 9000 AV250 

Common features in the FujiFilm AV250 and Olympus 9000

 AV250 9000 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm AV250 offers physical dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Check the FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the AV250 vs the 9000.

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the AV250 and 9000 is 94 and 92 respectively.

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV250 and 9000.

As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the FujiFilm AV250 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer AV250 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm AV250 Portrait photography info
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography info
29
good MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
20
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

FujiFilm AV250 Street photography details
Olympus 9000 Street photography details
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm AV250 Sports photography info
Olympus 9000 Sports photography info
30
good MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
low fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (180 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with FujiFilm AV250
Travel photography with Olympus 9000
62
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
terrible battery (180 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (32mm)
58
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (225g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm AV250 Landscape photography information
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography information
32
great maximum aperture (f)
good MP (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (32mm)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm AV250 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
25
great maximum aperture (f)
wide angle not great (32mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm AV250 and Olympus 9000
 FujiFilm FinePix AV250Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type FujiFilm FinePix AV250 Olympus Stylus 9000
Otherwise known as FinePix AV255 mju 9000
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-01-05 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3440 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 100 50
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 32-96mm (3.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 grams (0.37 pounds) 225 grams (0.50 pounds)
Physical dimensions 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photographs -
Type of battery AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $160 $300