FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000
94 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix AV255
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the AV250 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe AV250 was released 21 months later than the 9000 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the AV250 matches up vs the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV250 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm AV250 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Olympus 9000
| AV250 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the FujiFilm AV250
| 9000 | AV250 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm AV250 and Olympus 9000
| AV250 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm AV250 offers physical dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the AV250 vs the 9000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the AV250 and 9000 is 94 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV250 and 9000.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the FujiFilm AV250 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer AV250 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AV255 | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $160 | $300 |