FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-330
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
94 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV250
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix AV255
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the FujiFilm AV250 versus Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the AV250 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe AV250 was unveiled at a similar time to the VR-330 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the AV250 grades versus the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV250 & Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV250 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Olympus VR-330
| AV250 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the FujiFilm AV250
| VR-330 | AV250 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV250 and Olympus VR-330
| AV250 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | February 2011 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV250 has got exterior dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm AV250 versus Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the AV250 against the VR-330.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the AV250 and VR-330 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV250 and VR-330.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the FujiFilm AV250 to give you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV250 Portrait photography info
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography info
resolution is good (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm AV250
Street photography with Olympus VR-330
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
FujiFilm AV250 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography features
resolution is good (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
slow frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery (180 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm AV250
Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery (180 CIPA)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (32mm)
lighter than average in class (158g)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV250 Landscape photography info
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography info
good max aperture (f)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (32mm)
screen is small (2.7")
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery (180 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse function
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV250 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
good max aperture (f)
wide angle not great (32mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic support
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AV255 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $220 |