Clicky

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3

Portability
94
Imaging
39
Features
20
Overall
31
FujiFilm FinePix AV250 front
 
Ricoh CX3 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs

FujiFilm AV250
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 32-96mm (F) lens
  • 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2011
  • Alternate Name is FinePix AV255
Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the FujiFilm AV250 versus Ricoh CX3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the AV250 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The AV250 was brought out 7 months later than the CX3 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the AV250 matches up vs the CX3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Ricoh CX3

 AV250 CX3 
LaunchedJanuary 2011June 2010More recent by 7 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the FujiFilm AV250

 CX3 AV250 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the FujiFilm AV250 and Ricoh CX3

 AV250 CX3 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm AV250 provides physical dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Look at the FujiFilm AV250 versus Ricoh CX3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the AV250 versus the CX3.

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV250 and CX3 is 94 and 92 respectively.

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by checking a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV250 and CX3.

Clearly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the FujiFilm AV250 to give greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer AV250 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm AV250 Portrait photography info
Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography info
30
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
27
focusing manually
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with FujiFilm AV250
Street photography with Ricoh CX3
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (206g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with FujiFilm AV250
Sports photography with Ricoh CX3
30
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (180 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with FujiFilm AV250
Travel photography with Ricoh CX3
62
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery life (180 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
66
lighter than competitors (206g)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm AV250 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh CX3 as a Landscape photography camera
33
great maximum aperture (f)
decent megapixels (16MP)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery life (180 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
42
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm AV250 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX3 as a Vlogging camera
26
great maximum aperture (f)
wide angle not fantastic (32mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
30
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (206 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
Photography Glossary

FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm AV250 and Ricoh CX3
 FujiFilm FinePix AV250Ricoh CX3
General Information
Make FujiFilm Ricoh
Model FujiFilm FinePix AV250 Ricoh CX3
Also called as FinePix AV255 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-01-05 2010-06-16
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3440 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 32-96mm (3.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 168 grams (0.37 pounds) 206 grams (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photos -
Battery form AA -
Battery model - DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $160 $329