FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix AV255
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the AV250 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe AV250 was announced 4 years prior to the WG-M1 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the AV250 scores against the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AV250 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm AV250 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| AV250 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm AV250
| WG-M1 | AV250 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 44 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV250 and Ricoh WG-M1
| AV250 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV250 enjoys outer measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the AV250 and the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the AV250 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing specs. The image here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the AV250 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the FujiFilm AV250 to show greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged AV250 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm AV250 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AV255 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $160 | $2,000 |