Clicky

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
16
Overall
29
FujiFilm FinePix AX350 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

FujiFilm AX350
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2011
  • Additionally Known as FinePix AX355
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the FujiFilm AX350 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the AX350 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The AX350 was introduced 21 months after the 9000 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the AX350 scores vs the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Olympus 9000

 AX350 9000 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011May 2009Newer by 21 months

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the FujiFilm AX350

 9000 AX350 

Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus 9000

 AX350 9000 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display size
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm AX350 provides exterior dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the FujiFilm AX350 versus Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the AX350 versus the 9000.

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the AX350 and 9000 is 94 and 92 respectively.

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the AX350 and 9000.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the FujiFilm AX350 to produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer AX350 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with FujiFilm AX350
Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
29
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
20
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

FujiFilm AX350 Street photography advice
Olympus 9000 Street photography advice
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (225g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm AX350 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
30
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (180 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm AX350 Travel photography features
Olympus 9000 Travel photography features
56
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
not so great battery power (180 per charge)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
58
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (225g)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm AX350 Landscape photography features
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography features
28
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
not so great battery power (180 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
31
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with FujiFilm AX350
Vlogging with Olympus 9000
22
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
27
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (225g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus 9000
 FujiFilm FinePix AX350Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type FujiFilm FinePix AX350 Olympus Stylus 9000
Alternate name FinePix AX355 mju 9000
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2011-01-05 2009-05-14
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4608 x 3440 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max enhanced ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 100 50
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 33-165mm (5.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.3-5.9 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 grams (0.37 lbs) 225 grams (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photos -
Battery type AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $0 $300