FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 6020
94 Imaging
39 Features
16 Overall
29
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix AX355
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the FujiFilm AX350 versus Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the AX350 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe AX350 was unveiled 12 months later than the 6020 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the AX350 scores vs the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Olympus 6020
| AX350 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the FujiFilm AX350
| 6020 | AX350 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus 6020
| AX350 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm AX350 comes with outer measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm AX350 versus Olympus 6020 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the AX350 compared to the 6020.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the AX350 and 6020 is 94 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the AX350 and 6020.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the FujiFilm AX350 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern AX350 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AX355 | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) | 122 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $279 |
