FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
94 Imaging
39 Features
16 Overall
29
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix AX355
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the AX350 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe AX350 was launched 13 months earlier than the TG-820 iHS making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the AX350 grades vs the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| AX350 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the FujiFilm AX350
| TG-820 iHS | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 13 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| AX350 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AX350 features outer dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the AX350 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AX350 and TG-820 iHS is 94 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The pic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the AX350 and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the FujiFilm AX350 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged AX350 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Alternate name | FinePix AX355 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 220 photos |
| Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $500 |
