FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix AX355
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below is a extensive review of the FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the AX350 (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is very comparable and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe AX350 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the TG-830 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the AX350 scores versus the TG-830 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| AX350 | TG-830 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the FujiFilm AX350
| TG-830 iHS | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 24 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| AX350 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AX350 provides physical measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has sizing of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the AX350 compared to the TG-830 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AX350 and TG-830 iHS is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the AX350 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos although you need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older AX350 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm AX350 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Also Known as | FinePix AX355 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 300 images |
| Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $0 |