FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
FujiFilm AX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix AX355
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the FujiFilm AX350 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the AX350 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe AX350 was announced 4 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the AX350 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| AX350 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the FujiFilm AX350
| WG-4 GPS | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| AX350 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm AX350 has got external dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm AX350 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the AX350 against the WG-4 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AX350 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specs. The graphic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the AX350 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you would want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older AX350 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides face detection focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm AX350
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than average in class (235g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography highlights
MP count good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery (180 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (240 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
FujiFilm AX350 Travel photography features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography features
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
low battery (180 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery power (240 shots)
heavier than average in class (235 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm AX350
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery (180 shots)
does not have Timelapse mode
has manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
not so great battery power (240 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with FujiFilm AX350
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone port
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external mic support
heavier than average in class (235 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Also called | FinePix AX355 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $210 |