FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-80
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix AX355
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
Photography Glossary FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the FujiFilm AX350 and Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the AX350 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe AX350 was introduced 12 years earlier than the WG-80 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the AX350 grades against the WG-80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Ricoh WG-80
| AX350 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the FujiFilm AX350
| WG-80 | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 138 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Ricoh WG-80
| AX350 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.70" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm AX350 features outer dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm AX350 and Ricoh WG-80 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the AX350 versus the WG-80.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the AX350 and WG-80 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the AX350 and WG-80.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you should really take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged AX350 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Also Known as | FinePix AX355 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 300 shots |
| Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $300 |