FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix AX355
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the AX350 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe AX350 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the AX350 scores against the WG-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| AX350 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm AX350
| WG-M1 | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 44 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Ricoh WG-M1
| AX350 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AX350 enjoys outer measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the AX350 compared to the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the AX350 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the AX350 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the FujiFilm AX350 to produce extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The older AX350 will be behind in sensor tech.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm AX350 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AX355 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $2,000 |