FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
39 Features
16 Overall
29
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix AX355
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the FujiFilm AX350 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the AX350 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe AX350 was released 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the AX350 grades vs the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix AX350 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm AX350 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Samsung SL102
| AX350 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the FujiFilm AX350
| SL102 | AX350 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm AX350 and Samsung SL102
| AX350 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm AX350 enjoys outer dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm AX350 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the AX350 and the SL102.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the AX350 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the AX350 and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the FujiFilm AX350 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent AX350 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm AX350 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | FinePix AX355 | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 33-165mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $0 | $130 |