FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 9000
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched July 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Olympus 9000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the F300EXR (1/2") and 9000 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe F300EXR was released 15 months later than the 9000 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the F300EXR scores against the 9000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR and Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Olympus 9000
| F300EXR | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 15 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| 9000 | F300EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus 9000
| F300EXR | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm F300EXR enjoys outside measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the F300EXR vs the 9000.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the F300EXR and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the F300EXR and 9000.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical MP but different sensor measurements. The F300EXR uses the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier. The younger F300EXR should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also called | FinePix F305EXR | mju 9000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $280 | $300 |