FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 6020
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
FujiFilm F300EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix F305EXR
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 6020 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Olympus 6020, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is very similar but the F300EXR (1/2") and 6020 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe F300EXR was introduced 6 months after the 6020 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the F300EXR grades against the 6020 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Olympus 6020
| F300EXR | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| 6020 | F300EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus 6020
| F300EXR | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | February 2010 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F300EXR offers exterior measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the F300EXR versus the 6020.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F300EXR and 6020 is 91 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The image here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the F300EXR and 6020.
All in all, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The F300EXR using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus 6020 will offer extra detail using its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR Portrait photography advice
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography advice
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2")
lack of RAW format
MP count decent (13MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR as a Street photography camera
Olympus 6020 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2")
lack of RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (122 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 6020 as a Sports photography camera
incredible zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max fps very slow (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2")
lack of phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (13MP)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus 6020 Travel photography factors
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (122 grams)
weather sealing
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR Landscape photography information
Olympus 6020 Landscape photography information
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR Vlogging highlights
Olympus 6020 Vlogging highlights
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (215 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (122 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also called as | FinePix F305EXR | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-07-21 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 pounds) | 122g (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $280 | $279 |