FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 8000
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus 8000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the F300EXR (1/2") and 8000 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe F300EXR was introduced 13 months after the 8000 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the F300EXR matches up versus the 8000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Olympus 8000
| F300EXR | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 | July 2009 | More modern by 13 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| 8000 | F300EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus 8000
| F300EXR | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F300EXR comes with physical dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus 8000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the F300EXR versus the 8000.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F300EXR and 8000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the F300EXR and 8000.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The F300EXR uses the bigger sensor which will make getting bokeh easier. The younger F300EXR provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Also called as | FinePix F305EXR | mju Tough 8000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 1/4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 pounds) | 182g (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $280 | $380 |