FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released July 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly similar but the F300EXR (1/2") and TG-320 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe F300EXR was released 17 months prior to the TG-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the F300EXR matches up vs the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR and Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Olympus TG-320
| F300EXR | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| TG-320 | F300EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus TG-320
| F300EXR | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F300EXR offers outside dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the F300EXR vs the TG-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F300EXR and TG-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the F300EXR and TG-320.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The F300EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-320 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older F300EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also Known as | FinePix F305EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-07-21 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $280 | $0 |