FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34


91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the F300EXR (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the F300EXR (1/2") and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

The F300EXR was revealed 3 years prior to the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the F300EXR matches up against the TG-830 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
F300EXR | TG-830 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the FujiFilm F300EXR
TG-830 iHS | F300EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 30 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus TG-830 iHS
F300EXR | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm F300EXR comes with outer dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has proportions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the F300EXR versus the TG-830 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the F300EXR and TG-830 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The visual here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the F300EXR and TG-830 iHS.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The F300EXR having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older F300EXR will be behind in sensor tech.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Also referred to as | FinePix F305EXR | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 214g (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $280 | $0 |