Clicky

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34
FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

FujiFilm F300EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
  • Released July 2010
  • Also Known as FinePix F305EXR
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty similar but the F300EXR (1/2") and VR-320 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The F300EXR was manufactured 12 months prior to the VR-320 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the F300EXR grades versus the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Olympus VR-320

 F300EXR VR-320 
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the FujiFilm F300EXR

 VR-320 F300EXR 
ReleasedJuly 2011July 2010More modern by 12 months

Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus VR-320

 F300EXR VR-320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F300EXR comes with external measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the F300EXR against the VR-320.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the F300EXR and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The picture below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the F300EXR and VR-320.

All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The F300EXR featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged F300EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with FujiFilm F300EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
21
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2")
has no RAW support
33
megapixel count good (14MP)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

FujiFilm F300EXR Street photography details
Olympus VR-320 Street photography details
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (215g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2")
has no RAW support
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm F300EXR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
34
amazing zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2")
has no phase detect auto focus
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with FujiFilm F300EXR
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
63
lighter than average in class (215 grams)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (360mm)
no Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than others (158 grams)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm F300EXR Landscape photography info
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography info
38
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
42
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm F300EXR Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
30
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (215g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than others (158 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus VR-320
 FujiFilm FinePix F300EXROlympus VR-320
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR Olympus VR-320
Also Known as FinePix F305EXR -
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-07-21 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-360mm (15.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 215 grams (0.47 pounds) 158 grams (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $280 $179