FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Photography Glossary FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we are comparing the FujiFilm F300EXR and Samsung SL102, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very similar but the F300EXR (1/2") and SL102 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe F300EXR was manufactured 19 months later than the SL102 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the F300EXR matches up versus the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Samsung SL102
| F300EXR | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 19 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| SL102 | F300EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Samsung SL102
| F300EXR | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm F300EXR has external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm F300EXR and Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the F300EXR against the SL102.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the F300EXR and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the F300EXR and SL102.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The F300EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the FujiFilm F300EXR will deliver more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer F300EXR should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called as | FinePix F305EXR | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-21 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $280 | $130 |